<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener("load", function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <iframe src="http://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID=14638627&amp;blogName=The+Highest+Form+of+Hope&amp;publishMode=PUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT&amp;navbarType=BLUE&amp;layoutType=CLASSIC&amp;searchRoot=http%3A%2F%2Fjam199.blogspot.com%2Fsearch&amp;blogLocale=en_CA&amp;homepageUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fjam199.blogspot.com%2F" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" height="30px" width="100%" id="navbar-iframe" allowtransparency="true" title="Blogger Navigation and Search"></iframe> <div></div>

The Highest Form of Hope

... not just wishful thinking

 

My BFF has a blog!

Attention all... Jessica Packota now has a blog! I can finally share the girl I've known and loved for 22 years with all my friends who have never had the privilege of meeting her! So check out JP's blog on the blog roll!

Some other blogs of note:

Heather Moody/ Damchoe Wongmo: If you want to know what life is like in a Tibetan Monastery, check out my high school friend's blog.

Sarah Gingrich: Missionary in Chile, friend and most generous neighbour (especially with her vanilla extract) from Caronport. Talented artist, photographer and rower extraordinaire.

Labels:

 
 

you may be fat

Dear Noah,

I hate to break it to you, but I have concerns about you weight. Maybe it's because I'm used to the slim and trim babybrother used to be, but I think it's safe to say that you're fat. Now before you get all defensive, I want to list the following reasons why I think you may, in fact, be your fat.

1. For you, eating is an emotional roller coaster. One moment you're happy as the spoon enters your mouth, the next moment you're screaming in rage inbetween bites. It can't be healthy to be such an emotional eater. I think it's safe to say that you're trying to fill a void inside you - that you're trying to heal your wounded soul by stuffing your face.

2. Another clue to the truth about your weight is your propensity to hide snacks in the folds of your neck. Not only do you have the urge to snack all day long, your neck has enough flab to hide Cheerios, sometimes for days at a time.

3. You know you may be fat when you have cleavage - and not just bum cleavage. Do they make a bra size 17A?

4. When you fit into your three-and-a-half year old brother's pajamas - you may be fat.

5. We know that a healthy lifestyle not only includes eating the right portion size, but also adequate physical activity. One pushup Noah - that's all I ask, just ONE! Even your mother can do one pushup.

6. And finally - please do not be offended, I know this is a touchy subject - when you cannot see your own privates without the aid of a mirror, you may be fat.

Well, I hope this intervention has helped. The most important thing is that you love yourself. I am glad that you still seem to retain a good self esteem despite your obvious weight problem and that fact your mother has too much time on her hands.

Labels: ,

 
 

declaring war


I declare war on the following items... These things are enemies of my way of life and a threat to freedom! I call them the axis of annoyance.

1. Crows: I have written about my feelings for crows in the past. They are already planning their second insurrection in my backyard. As of yet, the weather remains cold enough that my windows stay closed at night and the early morning. But I know that come spring, there will be a resurgence in violence. We can expect casualties - but this is the cost of sleeping in until eight.

2. Genetically altered strawberries: These "berries" taste like well water! Sure, they're big and red on the outside, but what's the point if your strawberry shortcake tastes like shortcake? Can no one grow a normal strawberry anymore?

3. Dora the Explorer (and her cohorts): Honestly - is there a reason you feel you have to scream every single thing you say? Perhaps the laziest bunch of animators are to blame for this brainless cartoon. This show claims to be educational because it teaches kids to speak Spanish. Two Spanish words per episode is not worth listening to Dora scream everything she says and then stare at you silently for half an hour waiting for a response. I'll teach my kid to say "Ola" on my own, thank you very much. And don't get me started on all the crappy merchandise that has Dora's face plastered onto it.

4. Georges Stroumboulopoulos: I'll apologize in a advance to JP for this. George Stroumboulopoulos is quite possibly the most annoying Canadian celebrity other than the hosts of E-Talk. Why does he have to cock his head so much? He reminds me of some sort of bird. Has anyone else noticed that his head is unusually large? Though I appreciate the content in The Hour, I find Stroumboulopoulos very pretentious - he's a very obvious ploy to bring more young viewers to the CBC. He should have stuck to Much Music - that's more his level.

5. "Colours" art supply store: I know that it's so much easier to find than Art Placement - I have shopped there from time to time. But, in all honesty, nobody know anythings there. They are slow at the till, pushy will you're browsing, their selection is lacking and their prices are unreasonable. Plus, Glen Scrimshaw shops there. So take the extra time to find "Art Placement" instead - you will be amazed at the difference!

6. CSI Miami - Is it me or when a crime scene detective is faced with the impaled body of a swimsuit model he should either keep his mouth shut, show some sympathy for victim, maybe even show some disgust for the violence he has witnessed - but for goodness sake don't take off your sunglasses and say "I get the point" or some other ridiculous pun. And what scientist drives around in a hummer? And why are the crime scene investigators always pulling guns on people? Are they the police? What detective shamelessly shows her cleavage while interviewing suspects? For that matter, while are all CSI's hot?


And now, my allies against the axis of annoyance...

1. Yellow Mangoes: You know the ones I'm talking about. Not the big green ones, but the little yellow ones. Superstore has them in right now and they're sooooo good. They don't have all the stringy stuff that gets stuck in your teeth and they're much sweeter! YUM!

2. Cookies made with cake mix: As one who hates making cookies, these are a life saver! The recipe is so easy: 1 package of cake mix, 2 eggs and 1/2 a cup of margarine - mix and bake for 8-10 minutes at 375. So easy and tasty and only one bowl!

3. Starfall.com: The best kids website ever! It teaches letters, phonics, reading, math... The annoyance factor is low - it actually kind of cute, and there's no commercials or any attempt to sell you anything. Sasha has learned all his letters (capitals and lower case), sounds, and numbers from this website and now he's even started to recognize words and match them to pictures! (I feel like a lazy parent, but how can you compete?) The child only needs to use the mouse. I had to help Sasha the first few times, but it was so easy he got it within a few tries. There are lots of activities for kids between ages 2-9 years old. I highly recommend it!

4. Art Placement: The best art supply store in Saskatoon no contest. Everyone is so helpful and knowledgeable - they never make you feel stupid and they never try to sell you something you don't need. They have such great selection and really reasonable prices. If you're looking for good quality, cheap acrylic paint - this is where you go. Don't even think about going to Micheal's. And all you cardmaking and scapbooking people out there... The coloured and textured paper and vellum (beautiful stuff from all over the world) at Art Placement is WAY cheaper per sheet than any other craft store. You can get high quality 16x24" sheets for approx $1.20 a sheet. At Micheals, single sheets that are less than half that size go for the same price.

5. Poko: I love this show! It's so cute, never annoying, and I know that my kids won't pick up anything bad from it. It's also surprisingly entertaining. Sasha laughs his head off when he watches this show. It teaches children emotional intelligence and imaginative play. And I found that you can buy Poko DVD's on the CBC website - a little pricey but it's a great DVD to have around.

6. Clothes Swaps: A great way to recycle clothing. Get together with friends and swap clothes that don't fit anymore, kids clothes, or stuff that you're just tired of. It's a great way to
change up your wardrobe while saving carbon and cash!

Labels: ,

 
 

Gesture

The following are quotes from Betty Spackman in A Profound Weakness:

'And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us...' John 1:14

How common is that?
Gesture is the expression of desire. Desire and language come together in a gesture. God spoke words into existence because he wanted them to be there. He reached out, embracing death in order to give life.
Prophetic utterance. Flesh imprinted. The Word spoken in molecules and platelets and DNA.

Labels: ,

 
 

Question:


I have a question (or rather, questions).

I've read, heard and thought a great deal about the nature of evil recently. The idea that keeps coming up is that God does not make bad things happen; that God does not will tsunamis or earthquakes or pestilence in order to teach, discipline, or punish. That God is not the cause of these occurrences, that these tragedies are a consequence and result of the falleness of this world. Rather, God's grace works to redeem these situations - to bring meaning out of senseless destruction. God does not work to destroy the world but to restore it.

When I first heard this, it made sense to me; especially when considering the person of Jesus. But as I considered this further, everything began to fall apart (though the alternatives are much worse).

Question: What about the Old Testament? God explicitly commands the Israelites to killed entire cities, including women, children and infants. God destroys the world in a flood. God reeks pestilence on the Egyptians. God seems to be involved, at least on some level, in events that destroy life (I am assuming that death is a result of evil). Exactly how involved is God in these events? Are these events to be read as tragically necessary parts of God's redemptive plans for humanity, or should they be read as tragedies resulting from the falleness of this world that are divorced from God's character? Neither answer satisfies who I understand God to be from the New Testament.

Question: Out of this question, another is raised. Is the God of the Old Testament the same as the God of the New Testament? I know that what I read about God from the New Testament "trumps" the Old Testament in areas of discrepancy, but isn't this a rather large discrepancy? What I mean is, does God change? His plan to redeem the the world seems to travel through a kind of evolution, each phase revealing more of God's character. Was this just a performance for our benefit, or did God actually change his mind?

NT Wright puts this maddening contradiction between the Old Testament and New Testament this way {bold words added by me}:

...a reading of the Old Testament... tells a story which, from a bewildering variety of angles, is all about what God (the Creator God, please note {as if I didn't have enough questions, thank you very much!!}) is doing about evil. God has undertaken a plan: it is a daring and risky plan, involving God in so much ambiguity - one might almost say subterfuge - that he begins to look like a double agent, becoming compromised at many points in order to pull off the solution. (Evil and the Justice of God, pg 76)

God as double agent? It certainly looks that way in the story of Job, the Exodus and in the book of Joshua.

I don't know much, but I know that somehow the cross ties it all together. Though the cross was intended for the greatest evil, God intended it for the greatest good through the Resurrection. I know that the spy analogy will quickly break down, but does this qualify as the actions of a "double agent"?

I'm desperately looking for a conclusion, but I can't find one. So I think I'll leave it at that.

Labels: