
Johannes Vermeer, The Girl with the Pearl Earing 1665, Oil on Panel. Hart mentions Vermeer as an example in The Beauty of the Infinite.
I finished David Bentley Hart's The Beauty of the Infinite about a month ago, and it's still settling in. Considering the fact that I picked up the book on completely false pretenses (I thought he would write a little more than three pages on art - literally), it's been a formative coincidence indeed!
I don't want to make it sound like this was the "perfect" book in any regards (I found myself disagreeing with Hart in a few incidences at least - not only his ideas, but in many cases his tone), but I do think that considering my own context, this book reminded me why I am a Christian. Not because I was intellectually convinced, or emotionally manipulated (though these are no strangers to any of us); but because the story is different than any other - the story is at the same time complete anarchy and ultimate completion of every narrative told in order to make sense of a world seemingly as beautiful as it is terrible. This is the good news - the economy of sacrifice, the cycle of violence, the will to power is overthrown by an "anarchy of charity".
In my own backwards way, I ended up reading The Doors of the Sea (also by Hart but much much shorter). The Doors of the Sea was written as a response the December 2004 Tsunami and the subsequent theological debate over the god who could have willed such a catastrophe. It was a much more transparent work than The Beauty of the Infinite - the author as a person rather than an academic became visible. There are certainly moments of transparency in The Beauty of the Infinite, but they are unfortunately overshadowed by the sheer difficulty of the language (which was not always English - not joking).
One theme of both books that stood out to me was sacrifice. The world runs on sacrifice. We raise and kill animals in order to feed ourselves. The death of one creature feeds a multitude of others. The the shifting of tectonic plates causing a tsunami averts an even greater disaster. We see it in nearly all religious traditions, in art and literature - one dying to give another life. Perhaps it is out of our own necessity to make sense out of death - to make it beautiful, to make it necessary on some level. But what a painful narrative it can be, for it eventually dehumanizes those who experience suffering by telling them it is for a greater good - that death is just a part of life. It is a narrative that quickly becomes ugly when faced by the sheer senselessness of the most profound suffering.
The Christian story is so often portrayed as such; the final chapter in the narrative of sacrifice. But to think of Christ's death as "tragically necessary" as any other in the narrative of sacrifice would be to forget the gift of Christ, to forget grace. His death is rejection, not merely a necessary payment for sin. The resurrection is not only the overturn of death, but the second offering of the gift of Christ. Like Isaac, Christ is offered as a gift twice - in his birth and then saved from death.
I really can't do these ideas justice, but I'm feeling like I'm finally beginning to understand why the good news is good! Anyway, it's getting late and I'd better finish now before my editor makes another error in judgment...
Labels: aesthetics, books, sacrifice